Licencia Creative Commons

Friday, February 10, 2023

NORLFOK GROUP: 10 CUESTIONES PARA UNA COMISIÓN COVID-19 (II)

NORFOLK GROUP: 10 CUESTIONES PARA UNA COMISIÓN COVID-19 (I)


A group of scientists have raised 10 relevant questions regarding the COVID-19 response in the US. The questions are also relevant in Denmark and many other countries
Martin Kulldorff
@MartinKulldorff
JUST OUT: Our 80-page report with questions that a #Covid commission/hearing should ask government, media & scientists. Written by Drs. @DrJBhattacharya @LeslieBienen Ram Duriseti @TracyBethHoeg @MartinKulldorff @MartyMakary @MSmelkinsonPhD & @stemplet74. norfolkgroup.or
3. Why were schools and universities closed despite early evidence about the enormous age-gradient in COVID-19 mortality, early data showing that schools were not major sources of spread, and school closures would cause enormous collateral damage?
4. Why was there an almost exclusive focus on COVID-19 to the detriment of recognizing and mitigating collateral damage on other aspects of public health, including cancer screening and treatment, diabetes, cardio-vascular diseases, childhood vaccinations, and mental health?
5. Why did we fail to collect timely data to properly monitor and understand the pandemic? Why did we have to rely on studies from private initiatives and from other countries to understand the behavior of the virus and the effects of therapeutics, including vaccines?
6. Why was there so much emphasis and trust in complex epidemiological models, which are by nature unreliable during the middle of an epidemic, with unknown input parameters and questionable assumptions?
7. Could therapeutic trials have been run in a more timely manner? How was information on drug effectiveness and safety disseminated to doctors and clinicians? Were effective therapeutics easily accessible across the population? How did certain drugs become heavily politicized?
8. (my favorite): Why did vaccine randomized trials not evaluate mortality, hospitalization, and transmission as primary endpoints? Why were they terminated early?
9. (another favorite): Why the slowness to approve and roll out critical COVID-19 testing capacity? Why more emphasis on testing young asymptomatic individuals than on testing to better protect older high-risk citizens? Why so much effort spent on contact-tracing efforts?
10. Why emphasis on community masking and mask mandates, which had weak or no data to support them, at the expense of efficient and critical COVID-19 mitigation efforts?
3. Why were schools and universities closed despite early evidence about the enormous age-gradient in COVID-19 mortality, early data showing that schools were not major sources of spread, and school closures would cause enormous collateral damage?
 
I warmly support the call for COVID-19 commissions to answer these questions. The full scientific background for raising these questions - 80 pages in total - can be read here:
 

Wednesday, February 8, 2023

CARL SAGAN, SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR AND LOUIS BRANDEIS ("THE GOVERNMENT RUN US")

 

 

 


 

"Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means -- to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."


Louis Brandeis



"Tanto la decencia, como la seguridad y la libertad exigen que los funcionarios públicos estén sometidos a las mismas reglas de conducta que son obligaciones para el ciudadano. En un gobierno de leyes, la existencia del gobierno se pondrá en peligro si él no observa la ley escrupulosamente.Nuestro gobierno es el potente, el omnipresente maestro. Para bien o para mal el enseña a toda la gente con su ejemplo. El crimen es contagioso. Si el gobierno se convierte en un quebrantador de la ley, él alimenta el resentimiento por la ley; él invita a cada hombre a ser ley por sí mismo; él invita a la anarquía.Declarar que en la administración del derecho penal el fin justifica los medios-declarar que el gobierno puede cometer crímenes para asegurar la condena de un delincuente- traería una terrible consecuencia. A esta doctrina perniciosa este tribunal debería resueltamente hacerle frente."
 
Louis Brandeis
Dissenting, Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)