Licencia Creative Commons

Showing posts with label UNIÓN EUROPEA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UNIÓN EUROPEA. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 26, 2023

CUANDO LA RUTA ECONÓMICA FINALIZA: ¿OTRA GRAN DEPRESIÓN EN EL HORIZONTE? (TUOMAS MALINEN, BAKU DIALOGUES (II))

 

 

The crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think and then it happens much faster than you would have thought.

 – Rudiger Dornbusch


Conclusions

Rudiger Dornbusch (1942‑ 2002) was a renowned international macroeconomist, a demanding teacher at MIT, an intimidating public speaker (I hear), and one of the world’s leading experts on crisis management. One of his most famous quotes, in addition to this essay’s epigraph, considers the handling of the 1998 Brazilian economic crisis in Brazil: “When they [the Brazilians] call 1‑800‑BAILOUT, just let it ring. Say our operators are busy.”

Dornbusch was an unyielding opponent of governments meddling with the economy, but he did support the establishment of supranational entities to handle crises. I have become rather skeptical towards global governance organizations of late, and have recommended that countries stay out of IMF programs, and so on. However, this would require that a country’s economy be made “crisis proof” before the crisis hits. Essentially, this implies low indebtedness of households, corporations, and the government, limited foreign financial exposure, sufficient gold reserves in the central bank, and prudent oversight of the banking sector. Many countries have not done this, which means that they are likely to be forced to ask for IMF support in the near future.

The coming, or, more precisely, the ongoing crisis that will most likely re‑appear shortly in a more destructive form is likely to reshape the global economic structures in a dramatic way. The biggest losers are likely to be some of the world’s largest economies: the U.S., the EU, and possibly also China. Their economic “engines” have been pushed to their respective limits, and some form of breaking up is inevitable. However, what they may lose will become available for other countries to gain.

When a financial system crumbles, people and countries resort to necessities. Survival, quite naturally, becomes the main issue. In such a situation, resource rich nations like Azerbaijan have a natural upper hand. Playing it correctly requires that such countries take measures to prevent their economies from being The coming, or, more precisely, the ongoing crisis that will most likely re‑appear shortly in a more destructive form is likely to reshape the global economic structures in a dramatic way. pulled under by those that are in the process of failing. Thus, when the crisis re‑emerges, it will be imperative for such countries to cut without hesitation the toxic aspects of financial ties with the U.S., the EU, and possibly even China.

This will require the formulation of prudent national strategies to manage, first, the possible outflow of “hot money” (mostly through capital controls), second, currency and foreign exchange issues (especially if the EU is sucked into an epic currency crisis), and third, the country’s positioning in the context of the re‑forming of global economic structures. Grouping with like‑minded countries would be likely to establish important synergies, particularly if the Western bloc took what would likely represent a Dystopian turn through the issuance of CBDCs.

Major crises have always represented opportunities for the brave‑hearted, the prudent, and the prepared. If the ongoing banking crisis takes the sort of sinister turn outlined in this essay, then it will come to be seen as biggest reshuffling of the global economic and political order since the ‘Great War’ and the 1930s. This would, in turn, form the basis for the execution of a truly strategic opportunity for those states that provide global economic necessities like energy, minerals, and food to fill in the void, become economic safe havens, and secure sustainable prosperity for their respective populations. The time to start planning for such a contingency is now.

 

 

 

Monday, June 5, 2023

LA COOPERACIÓN ENTRE LA UE Y LA OMS SOBRE UN CERTIFICADO DIGITAL SANITARIO Y LA CDFUE

Article 8 Protection of personal data 

 1. Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her. 

2. Such data must be processed fairly for specified purposes and on the basis of the consent of the person concerned or some other legitimate basis laid down by law. Everyone has the right of access to data which has been collected concerning him or her, and the right to have it rectified.

 Article 21 Non-discrimination 

1. Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.

 Article 45 Freedom of movement and of residence 

 1. Every citizen of the Union has the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States. 

2. Freedom of movement and residence may be granted, in accordance with the Treaties, to nationals of third countries legally resident in the territory of a Member State. 

 Article 51 Field of application 

1. The provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law. They shall therefore respect the rights, observe the principles and promote the application thereof in accordance with their respective powers and respecting the limits of the powers of the Union as conferred on it in the Treaties. 

 2. The Charter does not extend the field of application of Union law beyond the powers of the Union or establish any new power or task for the Union, or modify powers and tasks as defined in the Treaties. 

Article 52 Scope and interpretation of rights and principles

 1. Any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by this Charter must be provided for by law and respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others. 

 2. Rights recognised by this Charter for which provision is made in the Treaties shall be exercised under the conditions and within the limits defined by those Treaties.

 3. In so far as this Charter contains rights which correspond to rights guaranteed by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the meaning and scope of those rights shall be the same as those laid down by the said Convention. This provision shall not prevent Union law providing more extensive protection. 

4. In so far as this Charter recognises fundamental rights as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, those rights shall be interpreted in harmony with those traditions.

Monday, February 20, 2023

"NOTA PARA CASOS LEGALES EN EUROPA: REGULACIÓN EN LA UE DE LAS "CONTRAMEDIDAS" MEDICAS" (LATYPOVA)

 

"Legal structures were created in the European Union echoing the US structures as evidence of the global pre-planned "plandemic" event.

This post is a technical note for ex-US legal cases. This information is for EU, but since my hunch was correct about this in EU, I encourage everyone in other parts of the world to see if you can find same provisions in all the countries that marched in lockstep.

I correspond with many people all over the world on the subjects related to the covid fraud agenda. I assist in as many legal cases as ask for my help and materials. Any possible strategy should be tried against this evil and I try to help anyone who asks for help. This post provides information for those working in Europe, and confirms that the EU planners of militarized mass murder via a pretend “health emergency” apparently had harmonized with the US counterparts in preparation for this “live exercise” (was it Pompeo who let this slip? Readers, please let me know in the comments). If this doesn’t describe globally premeditated crime, I don’t know what does. 

 

I received the following information from a lawyer working in EU, to which I added some explanatory notes:

“We found the EU provisions corresponding more or less with the provisions in US in relation to “Medical countermeasures” in case of “natural or man-made disaster”, Sasha was always sure they exist also elsewhere in the world. We always thought that all the actions we experienced were covered by the provisions of EU law relating to conditional marketing authorisations (Note: CMA is a regulatory approval pathway in EU “almost like” a full drug approval, which was used to release the injections on the market), which we now need to learn is not the case.

Council Decision No. 1082/2013, Art. 5, laid the ground for the financing of medical counter measures. It reads:

The institutions of the Union and any Member States which so desire may engage in a joint procurement procedure conducted pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 104(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union ( 14 ) and pursuant to Article 133 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union ( 15 ), with a view to the advance purchase of medical countermeasures for serious cross-border threats to health.”

This Decision has been repealed in the meantime by Regulation 2022/2371 of 6 December 2022.

However, in 2016 the EU enacted a Regulation (EU) 2016/369, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0369&from=EN , which provides for emergency support within the European Union. Emergency support “may be awarded through specific measures appropriate to the economic situation in the event of an ongoing or potential natural or man-made disaster.” (Art. 1 (1))  Based on a decision of the Council according to Art. 2 of Regulation 2016/369/EU “to activate the emergency support” under this Regulation, after proposal submitted by the EU Commission, the stage has been set for financing “specific measures” against threat emerging from “human made or natural disasters”. Art. 2 of this Regulation reads:

“1. The decision about the activation of the emergency support under this Regulation in case of an ongoing or potential disaster shall be taken by the Council on the basis of a proposal by the Commission, specifying where appropriate the duration of the activation.”

On 14 April 2020 this Regulation was amended by Regulation (EU) 2020/521 with retroactive effect as of 1 February 2020,  in order to extend the application of this Regulation to emergency support during Covid-19 crises.

In its Art. 1 the “emergency support under Council Regulation (EU) 2016/369” is activated.

Recital (19) reads:

“Member States have declared, as parties to the Joint Procurement Agreement referred to in Article 5 of Decision No 1082/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, their agreement to the inclusion of ongoing joint procurement procedures under that Article in the fast-track procurement procedure established by this Regulation, under the conditions set out therein. The type of medical countermeasures to be procured and the distribution of the countermeasures to Member States should follow any agreement reached under those ongoing procedures.”

This Regulation provides for an Annex of Regulation 2016/369/EU in which it enumerates the eligible measures which may be funded in case of emergency situations. It says that the enumeration is not exhaustive and it reads:

“The following actions may be financed in case of pandemics with large‐scale effect:

(a) temporary reinforcement of the medical workforce, exchange of medical professionals, hosting foreign patients or other type of mutual support;

(b) deployment of temporary healthcare facilities and temporary extension of existing healthcare facilities to relieve pressure on existing structures and increase overall healthcare capacity;

(c) activities to support the administration of large‐scale application of medical tests and prepare the necessary scientific testing strategies and protocols;

(d) setting up temporary quarantine facilities and other appropriate measures at the Union borders;

(e) development, production or purchase and distribution of medical products;

(f) increases and conversions of production capacities for medical products as referred to in point (e) to address supply shortages;

(g) maintenance of the stock of medical products as referred to in point (e) and their disposal;

(h) actions to support the necessary steps to obtain approval for the use of the medical products as referred to in point
(e) if required;

(i) actions to develop appropriate methods to track the development of the pandemic and the results of measures
implemented to address it;

(j) organisation of ad‐hoc clinical trials of potential therapies or diagnostics according to trial standards agreed at Union level;

(k) scientific validation of medical products, including potential new testing methods.

The above list is not exhaustive.’

To my mind, lit. h) opens “the door” to any actions they assume necessary in order to achieve their goal of obtaining approval for the use of medical products. Thus, they are free to abstain from any provisions applicable to medicinal products /drugs and medical devices, to agree with their suppliers whatever they wish. Lit (j) is also very enlightening as it shows that for “ad-hoc” clinical trials they don’t apply GCP (Note: Good Clinical/ Good Manufacturing Practice laws) but their “trial standards agreed at Union level” – whatever this means.

I think this also shows the clear fraud in the European Union they committed to all citizens, giving the impression that they evaluated the injections according to existing standards for the evaluation of medicinal products at least on the basis of conditional marketing authorisations, whereas behind the scenes they were free to make whatever they desired”."

(YOU COULD PREFER TO READ "FRAUD" AS "EXCEPTION" FROM THE ORDINARY LEGAL PROVISIONS, ACCORDING TO THE PREVIOUS POST ON USA COUNTERMEASURES) 

Monday, March 21, 2022

"LA BRÚJULA ESTRATÉGICA" DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA, LOS TRATADOS DE LA UE Y LA CONSTITUCIÓN ESPAÑOLA (I)

 

La participación de España, al menos, no contaría con el respaldo de los Tratados de la UE firmados (arts 3 y 4 TFUE), constituye una cesión de soberanía en el área de la defensa no cubierta por los mismos ni por la Constitución Española (arts 93 y 94) y requería, por todo ello, la intervención y ratificación de las Cortes 

 

Y lo mismo sucedería respecto de los restantes Estados miembros 

 

Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea

 

Artículo 1

 1. El presente Tratado organiza el funcionamiento de la Unión y determina los ámbitos, la delimitación y las condiciones de ejercicio de sus competencias. 

2. El presente Tratado y el Tratado de la Unión Europea constituyen los Tratados sobre los que se fundamenta la Unión. Estos dos Tratados, que tienen el mismo valor jurídico, se designarán con la expresión «los Tratados». 

TÍTULO I CATEGORÍAS Y ÁMBITOS DE COMPETENCIAS DE LA UNIÓN 

Artículo 2 

1. Cuando los Tratados atribuyan a la Unión una competencia exclusiva en un ámbito determinado, sólo la Unión podrá legislar y adoptar actos jurídicamente vinculantes, mientras que los Estados miembros, en cuanto tales, únicamente podrán hacerlo si son facultados por la Unión o para aplicar actos de la Unión. 

2. Cuando los Tratados atribuyan a la Unión una competencia compartida con los Estados miembros en un ámbito determinado, la Unión y los Estados miembros podrán legislar y adoptar actos jurídicamente vinculantes en dicho ámbito. Los Estados miembros ejercerán su competencia en la medida en que la Unión no haya ejercido la suya. Los Estados miembros ejercerán de nuevo su competencia en la medida en que la Unión haya decidido dejar de ejercer la suya.

 3. Los Estados miembros coordinarán sus políticas económicas y de empleo según las modalidades establecidas en el presente Tratado, para cuya definición la Unión dispondrá de competencia.

 4. La Unión dispondrá de competencia, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Tratado de la Unión Europea, para definir y aplicar una política exterior y de seguridad común, incluida la definición progresiva de una política común de defensa. 

5. En determinados ámbitos y en las condiciones establecidas en los Tratados, la Unión dispondrá de competencia para llevar a cabo acciones con el fin de apoyar, coordinar o complementar la acción de los Estados miembros, sin por ello sustituir la competencia de éstos en dichos ámbitos. Los actos jurídicamente vinculantes de la Unión adoptados en virtud de las disposiciones de los Tratados relativas a esos ámbitos no podrán conllevar armonización alguna de las disposiciones legales y reglamentarias de los Estados miembros. 

6. El alcance y las condiciones de ejercicio de las competencias de la Unión se determinarán en las disposiciones de los Tratados relativas a cada ámbito. 

Artículo 3 

1. La Unión dispondrá de competencia exclusiva en los ámbitos siguientes: a) la unión aduanera; b) el establecimiento de las normas sobre competencia necesarias para el funcionamiento del mercado interior; c) la política monetaria de los Estados miembros cuya moneda es el euro; d) la conservación de los recursos biológicos marinos dentro de la política pesquera común; e) la política comercial común. 

2. La Unión dispondrá también de competencia exclusiva para la celebración de un acuerdo internacional cuando dicha celebración esté prevista en un acto legislativo de la Unión, cuando sea necesaria para permitirle ejercer su competencia interna o en la medida en que pueda afectar a normas comunes o alterar el alcance de las mismas. 

Artículo 4 

1. La Unión dispondrá de competencia compartida con los Estados miembros cuando los Tratados le atribuyan una competencia que no corresponda a los ámbitos mencionados en los artículos 3 y 6. 

2. Las competencias compartidas entre la Unión y los Estados miembros se aplicarán a los siguientes ámbitos principales: a) el mercado interior; b) la política social, en los aspectos definidos en el presente Tratado; c) la cohesión económica, social y territorial; d) la agricultura y la pesca, con exclusión de la conservación de los recursos biológicos marinos; e) el medio ambiente; f) la protección de los consumidores; g) los transportes; h) las redes transeuropeas; i) la energía; j) el espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia; k) los asuntos comunes de seguridad en materia de salud pública, en los aspectos definidos en el presente Tratado. 

3. En los ámbitos de la investigación, el desarrollo tecnológico y el espacio, la Unión dispondrá de competencia para llevar a cabo acciones, en particular destinadas a definir y realizar programas, sin que el ejercicio de esta competencia pueda tener por efecto impedir a los Estados miembros ejercer la suya. 

4. En los ámbitos de la cooperación para el desarrollo y de la ayuda humanitaria, la Unión dispondrá de competencia para llevar a cabo acciones y una política común, sin que el ejercicio de esta competencia pueda tener por efecto impedir a los Estados miembros ejercer la suya.