#TexasAttorneyGeneral #KenPaxton
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) November 30, 2023
Is suing #Pfizer for #misrepresenting Covid-19 #vaccineefficacy and #conspiring to censor public discourse https://t.co/oJiUNf0qYI
Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA)
Pfizer has in the course and conduct of trade and commerce, with the requisite mental state, engaged in various false, misleading, or deceptive acts or practices declared unlawful by and in violation of section 17.46(a) of the DTPA, including by intentionally, knowingly, and/or recklessly engaging in conduct specifically defined to be false, deceptive, or misleading under section 17.46(b).
Count I: Misrepresentations Concerning Relative Risk Reduction.
154. Pfizer misrepresented that its vaccine was 95% effective at preventing COVID- 19 infections in all people, when in fact the data Pfizer relied on was inapposite for such representations, and Pfizer distorted the truth.
155. Pfizer chose a self-serving and deceptive metric reflecting percentage reduction in the rate of infection present in its limited Phase 2/3 trial on a relative basis, not the absolute risk reduction for its vaccine, information that it withheld from the consuming public. See supra ¶¶ 43-156. In doing so, Pfizer violated sections 17.46(a), 17.46(b)(5), 17.46(b)(7), and 17.46(b)(24) of the DTPA.
Count II: Misrepresentations Concerning Durability of Protection.
157. Pfizer misrepresented that its vaccine provided durable and sustained protection against COVID-19 infection, see supra ¶¶ 73-82, when in fact FDA had previously informed the company that it was not possible to know the duration of the vaccine’s effectiveness beyond two months. See supra ¶¶ 43, 49.A,
158. Data revealed throughout the course of 2021 demonstrated that protection from Pfizer’s vaccine waned rapidly. See supra ¶¶ 94, 96, 105-09, 120.
159. Moreover, Pfizer withheld highly relevant data not only showing that efficacy waned rapidly but confirming that Pfizer’s representations about durable efficacy were unwarranted and deceiving when made. See supra ¶ 80.
160. In doing so, Pfizer violated sections 17.46(a), 17.46(b)(5), 17.46(b)(7), and 17.46(b)(24) of the DTPA.
Count III: Misrepresentations Concerning Transmission.
161. Pfizer misrepresented that vaccination against COVID-19 prevented “transmission” between persons, see supra ¶¶ 66-72, including from vaccinated persons with symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19 infections, when in fact FDA previously made clear to Pfizer that more information was needed to make transmission-related claims. See supra ¶¶ 42, 47, 49.B, 49.D.
162. Data developed throughout the course of 2021 revealed that Pfizer’s vaccine was highly ineffective at preventing vaccinated persons from transmitting infections to other persons. See supra ¶¶ 96, 103-04.
163. Pfizer created this false impression by exploiting the heightened fear and uncertainty amongst the public, insinuating that vaccination constituted an imperative to protect loved ones. See supra ¶¶ 68-70. 164. In doing so, Pfizer violated sections 17.46(a), 17.46(b)(5), 17.46(b)(7), and 17.46(b)(24) of the DTPA.
Count IV: Misrepresentations Concerning Protection Against Variants.
165. Pfizer misrepresented that its vaccine had substantial efficacy against COVID-19 variants—in particular, the Delta variant. See supra ¶¶ 83-90. At minimum, Pfizer created the false impression and led the public to reasonably believe that the vaccine performed comparatively well against variants as compared to the initial virus.
166. In reality, Pfizer clearly lacked data to support such claims, and the modest amount in its possession instead pointed to the opposite conclusion, as well as underscored the baselessness of Pfizer’s claims in the first instance. See supra ¶¶ 95, 110-16, 120-22.
167. In doing so, Pfizer violated sections 17.46(a), 17.46(b)(5), 17.46(b)(7), and 17.46(b)(24) of the DTPA.
Count V: Scheme to Conceal Vaccine Underperformance.
168. Pfizer created the false impression that its vaccine provided a substantially greater amount of protection against COVID-19 infection than what it afforded in reality. Pfizer undertook a continuous and widespread campaign comprised of the deceptive concerning alleged above for the purpose of misleading the public about the efficacy of its vaccine, see supra ¶¶ 125-38.
169. This course deceptive conduct was reinforced and extended by Pfizer’s efforts to censor persons who sought to disseminate truthful information that would undermine is its ongoing deception. See supra ¶¶ 125-38.
170. In doing so, Pfizer violated sections 17.46(a) and 17.46(b)(8) of the DTPA.
#DEMANDA DEL #FISCALGENERAL DE #TEXAS CONTRA #PFIZER, INC. https://t.co/G63wOaSsq4
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) December 4, 2023
TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA DEMANDA DEL FISCAL REFERIDA A LAS INFRACCIONES DE LA "TEXAS #DECEPTIVE #TRADE #PRACTICES #ACT"https://t.co/PzNPlkz9DP#vacunacovid
🔥 AG Ken Paxton on the Lawsuit Texas Filed Against Pfizer for Misleading the Public About the COVID-19 Vaccines
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) December 5, 2023
"The federal government long ago back in the 80's passed a law that gave protection to pharmaceutical companies when they provided vaccines. There's no liability,… pic.twitter.com/7QV5SCYSL0
#Pfizer #Lawsuit Awakens US to Mass CV19 Vax Murders – #KarenKingston | Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog https://t.co/flqiivcpgz via @usawatchdog
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) December 9, 2023
How big is this? Kingston says, “It could be $350 billion in fines for Pfizer, and they cannot get out of this by going bankrupt.”
No comments:
Post a Comment