LA ENMIENDA PENAL "PFIZER" (FRANCIA) QUE CRIMINALIZARÍA A LOS CRÍTICOS DE LAS VACUNAS mRNA (II)

 

 

Artículo 223.1. 2 del Código Penal:

"La provocación para abandonar o abstenerse de un tratamiento médico terapéutico o profiláctico, cuando tal abandono o abstención se presente como un beneficio para la salud de las personas afectadas y cuando la intención o abstención se pretende que beneficia la salud de las personas afectadas, aunque sea, en el estado del conocimiento médico, indiscutiblemente, la causa, teniendo en cuenta las patologías sufridas,de serias consecuencias para su salud física o mental.

(...)

Cuando la provocación contemplada en los dos primeros párrafos anteriores haya sido seguida las penas se incrementarán a tres años de prisión y multa de 45.000 euros.

Cuando tales prácticas se lleven a cabo por medio de imprenta o medios audiovisuales, las previsiones específicas de las leyes reguladoras de tales medios serán aplicables para determinar las personas responsables"

 

 

Important clarification on the French law criminalising medical dissent:

A report by Robert Kogon (pen name) of the Daily Sceptic questions the claim that this law "qualifies any opposition to mRNA-LNP injections as a "sectarian aberration"".

I have yet to read the law in… https://t.co/prUxnh7il1

— David Thunder (@davidjthunder) February 17, 2024

En cuanto a si los tratamientos médicos terapéuticos o profilácticos incluyen las vacunas, deben mencionarse los cambios en las definiciones acaecidos, precisamente, durante las campañas COVID (que claramente están ahora incluidas en los mismos):

Changing Definitions

“Vaccine” is now defined as “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.

“Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose,” the definition reads.

The previous definition was “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”

“Vaccination” was changed to “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease” from “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”

 The Epoch Times has obtained the emails and additional messages concerning the changes and has published all 67 pages of them.

 

LOS CORREOS DEL CDC (USA) SOBRE SUS CAMBIOS DE LA DEFINICIÓN DE "VACUNA"

 

 

Emails Confirm Why CDC Changed Definitions of Vaccine, Vaccinated 

 Newly obtained emails confirm that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed its definition for both “vaccine” and “vaccinated” because people were pointing out that the definitions didn’t seem to apply to the COVID-19 vaccines.

 “The definition of vaccine we have posted is problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition,” Alycia Downs, a CDC official, wrote in an email to a colleague on Aug. 25, 2021. The definition is located on the CDC webpage on immunization basics. 

 “Vaccine” had been defined since at least 2011 by the CDC as a product that triggers immunity, while “vaccination” was described as an injection that prevents a disease, according to archived versions of the page. However, a flood of inquiries on the definitions was triggered by the fact that the COVID-19 vaccines have been increasingly ineffective against infection by the virus that causes COVID-19, the emails show. 

 “Our question is how is the CDC and the rest of the world allowed to call the shot a vaccination when it doesn’t even meet your own definition,” one person wrote to the CDC. 

 “Right-wing covid-19 pandemic deniers are using your ‘vaccine’ definition to argue that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines,” another said. 

 The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are both built on messenger RNA technology. They’re two of the three COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States. 

 Downs and colleagues Allison Michelle Fisher, Cynthia Jorgensen, Valerie Morelli, and Andrew (no last name given) worked on changing the definitions for “vaccine” and “vaccination,” according to the emails.

The changes were pushed through on Aug. 31, 2021, and Sept. 1, 2021, respectively.

Changing Definitions

“Vaccine” is now defined as “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.

“Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose,” the definition reads.

The previous definition was “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”

“Vaccination” was changed to “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease” from “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”

 The Epoch Times has obtained the emails and additional messages concerning the changes and has published all 67 pages of them.

The batch of emails, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, also shows that Andrew, a CDC employee on the agency’s Vaccine Task Force, boosted a Washington Post article that downplayed criticism of the change.